The No LHD Literature-Wrong Information
February 12th, 2012I was given a copy of the literature (one piece of paper) from the “Say No To LHD” folks.
2 things immediately stand out as just wild misinformation !! Just plain WRONG information!! Hello.
1) Their claim that the LHD Commission would only require 2 Newburyport residents. WRONG! FALSE!
Every member on the LHD Commission would be a Newburyport resident, just like any other Newburyport board and commission. It was assumed that people would understand this. But since there is so much misinformation out there, the wording on the second draft of the LHD ordinance will clarify that the Commission will be made up of Newburyport residents only, not “outsiders.”
2) Their claim that any changes, including enlargement of the LHD or additional restrictions, would require a simple majority vote in the Newburyport City Council. WRONG! FALSE!
A) Any change to the ordinance would require a super majority vote in the council, 8 out of the 11 councilors. (Mass General Law 40C, Section 3)
“Any ordinance or by-law creating an historic district may, from time to time, be amended in any manner not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter by a two-thirds vote of the city council in a city..”
B) And if the LHD were to be enlarged, the city would go through the exact same thing that it has gone through with the creating this LHD. There would be a new investigation, the new area would be reviewed by the Massachusetts Historical Commission, there would be a public hearing, and it would need to be approved by the council by a super majority, 8 out of the 11 councilors. (Mass General Law 40C, Section 3)
“An historic district may be enlarged or reduced or an additional historic district in a city or town created in the manner provided for creation of the initial district…”
Please, facts are important. Get the facts right!!